Inteligencia Artificial

Apple could put enhanced Siri AI behind a paywall

A well-known leaker suggests that the most advanced Siri features with artificial intelligence would require an additional subscription, similar to ChatGPT Plus.

June 16, 2026 · 4 min read

Close-up of a smartphone with a delivery app interface in a person's hand, emphasizing modern e-commerce.

TL;DR: Apple could charge a subscription for advanced Siri AI features, according to a leaker. This would change Siri's free strategy and could split the user experience.

What happened?

According to a TechRadar report citing a well-known Apple leaker, the Cupertino company is considering charging a monthly subscription for access to the most advanced Siri features powered by artificial intelligence. The leaker, known as 'AppleTipster', stated: 'I think we will see a separate subscription.' This would mean that enhanced Siri capabilities, expected to compete with assistants like ChatGPT, would be behind a paywall, while basic functions remain free. The rumor comes at a key moment: Apple is preparing to integrate its own large language model (LLM) into Siri, with an announcement expected at WWDC 2024. However, the source did not specify prices or timelines, and warned that plans could still change.

Why is this important?

Apple has built its ecosystem around seamless and free integration of its services. Charging for Siri would represent a significant paradigm shift. The company has already ventured into subscriptions with iCloud+, Apple Music, and Apple TV+, but has never before charged for a core operating system feature. If confirmed, this measure could split the user experience between those who pay and those who don't, affecting the perceived value of the iPhone and other Apple devices. Moreover, the timing is critical: Apple is late to generative AI. While OpenAI launched ChatGPT in November 2022 and Google introduced Bard in 2023, Siri has lagged behind. A paywall could discourage users from trying the new Siri, just when Apple needs to prove it can compete. It also contrasts with Microsoft's strategy, which integrated GPT-4 into Bing and Office for free initially, or Google, which offers Gemini at no cost in its basic tier.

Consequences for businesses and users

For users, the decision could mean an additional monthly expense if they want to make the most of Apple's AI. Businesses that rely on Siri for productivity may need to reassess their costs. Additionally, this could accelerate the adoption of rival free assistants like Google Assistant or Alexa. For Apple, it poses a risk of fragmenting its ecosystem and potential consumer backlash. However, there is also a precedent: Apple already charges for iCloud+ and Apple Fitness+, and its paying user base is loyal. According to Counterpoint data, Apple's services generated over $85 billion in revenue in 2023, with high margins. Charging for advanced Siri could add another stream of recurring revenue, but at the cost of slowing AI adoption. Furthermore, developers who integrate Siri into their apps could be affected if premium functionality is not available to all users.

“Apple's strategy has always been to offer a premium experience with no hidden costs. Charging for Siri would be a 180-degree turn.” — Analyst at TheVortiq

Historical context

Apple has been lagging in the generative AI race. While OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft launched advanced conversational assistants, Siri has fallen behind. The company is working on its own large language model (LLM) to update Siri, but the computational cost of these technologies is high. Charging for them could help fund development and necessary infrastructure. Historically, Apple has preferred to monetize through hardware and services, not operating system features. However, pressure from Wall Street to show services growth may be driving this change. In 2023, Apple's services revenue reached a record $22.3 billion in the December quarter, up 11% year-over-year. If Apple can convert a fraction of its 2.2 billion active devices into Siri+ subscribers, the financial impact would be enormous. However, the risk of alienating users is real: a 2023 SellCell survey showed that 47% of iPhone users would consider switching to Android if Apple charged for basic features.

What readers should know

It is important to note that this information comes from an unofficial leaker and has not been confirmed by Apple. The company could opt for a different model, such as including advanced features in Apple One or keeping them free to foster loyalty. Users should wait for official announcements before drawing conclusions. Apple has a history of denying last-minute rumors, and it is possible the leaker is speculating. Additionally, competition could force Apple to keep Siri free: Google and Amazon offer advanced assistants at no cost, and Samsung is integrating AI for free into its Galaxy devices. If Apple charges, it could lose the battle for AI adoption at home and work. For now, it is best to wait for WWDC 2024, where Apple is expected to reveal its AI plans. Meanwhile, users can continue using Siri for free, albeit with limited features.

Keep reading